Measles Immunization in
HIV-Infected Children
Committee on Infectious
Diseases and Committee on Pediatric AIDS
ABSTRACT
Children
infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have had high rates of
mortality attributable to measles, but until recently, measles vaccine was
assumed to be safe for these children. A single fatal case of pneumonia
attributable to vaccine type-measles virus has been documented in a young adult
with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Because a protective immune response
often does not develop in severely immunocompromised
HIV-infected patients after immunization and some risk of severe complications
exists, HIV-infected children, adolescents, and young adults who are severely immunocompromised (based on age-specific CD4 lymphocyte
enumeration) attributable to HIV infection should not receive measles vaccine.
All other HIV-infected children, adolescents, and young adults who are not
severely immunocompromised should receive
measles-mumps-rubella vaccine.
ABBREVIATIONS: HIV, human immunodeficiency
virus; MMR, measles-mumps-rubella (vaccine); IGIV, intravenous immune globulin.
BACKGROUND
Live
attenuated measles virus vaccine has been recommended for children,
adolescents, and young adults with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
infection to prevent morbidity and mortality attributable to measles.1,2 The immunosuppressive effect of HIV predisposes to
high mortality rates in HIV-infected children who develop measles. In
developing nations, the mortality rate attributable to measles has been 50% for
HIV-infected children.1-3 From 1989 through
1991, 55,000 cases of measles occurred in the
A
single report of a 21-year-old college student who received a second dose of
measles vaccine in September 1992 has provided the first indication of
potential harmful consequences of measles vaccine in a severely immunocompromised HIV-infected person.5 This man
had a CD4 cell count of 10/µL at the time of immunization, and Pneumocystis carinii
pneumonia developed 1 to 2 months after he received the second dose of MMR
vaccine. Approximately 1 year after vaccination, he was evaluated for
progressive pulmonary disease. A transbronchial
biopsy revealed multinucleated giant cells, and a measles virus was cultured
that has been identified as vaccine-like by genomic sequencing. The patient
died in December 1993, approximately 15 months after receipt of the vaccine.
This patient had no identified measles rash, and progressive nodular disease
was evident on the chest radiograph. Similar pulmonary disease associated with
wild type and vaccine virus-induced disease has been reported in other immunocompromised patients.7,8
Progressive pulmonary disease attributable to wild type measles infection has
developed in HIV-infected persons.9,10
Measles
as the cause of the pneumonia in this HIV-infected patient was not appreciated
until 11 to 12 months after administration of MMR vaccine. This long incubation
period is unique; however, wild type measles virus may establish a persistent
infection. This raises the possibility that other HIV-infected patients with
pulmonary disease might not have been evaluated for the presence of measles
virus, although no other cases of MMR-associated pulmonary complications have
been reported after immunization in HIV-infected children.
MEASLES
IMMUNITY IN HIV-EXPOSED OR HIV-INFECTED INFANTS
HIV-infected
women have lower concentrations of measles-specific antibodies and they
transmit less measles antibody to their infants, resulting in susceptibility at
a younger age than usual.11
ADMINISTRATION
OF MMR TO HIV-INFECTED CHILDREN, ADOLESCENTS, AND YOUNG ADULTS WITHOUT SEVERE
IMMUNOSUPPRESSION
Several
studies have substantiated a suboptimal and unpredictable response to MMR
vaccine in HIV-infected children.12-14 Also, measles antibody titers
decline more rapidly after immunization in HIV-infected children compared with
uninfected children.15,16 However, the administration of MMR vaccine
to HIV-infected children, adolescents, and young adults without severe immunosuppression continues to be important, and
administration of vaccine before deterioration of the immunologic status
provides the best opportunity to induce protection. Immunization of
HIV-infected infants at 9 to 11 months was associated with somewhat better
antibody responses17,18 than in children at
12 to 15 months in two small studies; this question of the optimal age of
immunization is being addressed in a randomized study conducted by the AIDS
Clinical Trial Group. Pending the results of this trial, HIV-infected children
should be immunized as soon as they reach 12 months of age to induce an
appropriate immune response. The second dose may be administered as soon as 30
days later in an attempt to induce early seroconversion.
All persons in the household who are not HIV-infected and not otherwise immunocompromised should have immunity to measles. Immunity
is defined as having been born before 1957, a history of physician-diagnosed
measles, laboratory evidence of immunity, or age-appropriate immunization.
HIV-INFECTED
CHILDREN, ADOLESCENTS, AND YOUNG ADULTS WITH SEVERE IMMUNOSUPPRESSION
Attenuated
measles vaccine virus has caused fatal disease in one severely immunosuppressed HIV- infected patient. Because measles
vaccine has been safely administered to >1000 HIV-infected children in the
United States, we know that the risk of vaccine-induced virus disease is much
less than that of wild type measles virus, but most of the children were not
severely immunocompromised at the time of
immunization. The antibody response to measles vaccine decreases as the level
of immunosuppression increases.13,17,18 In
one study, measles antibody developed after vaccination in 71% (12/17) of
children without severe immunosuppression, but
antibody developed in only 17% (3/18) of those with severe immunosuppression.15
In another study, 90% of HIV-infected children with CD4 lymphocyte counts
<200/µL did not respond to measles vaccine, and severe disease after
exposure to measles developed in some HIV-infected children who had been
immunized.13 Thus, measles vaccine should not be administered to
severely immunosuppressed HIV-infected children,
adolescents, and young adults because they do not respond well to measles
vaccine and there is some risk of serious complications. Whether a given CD4+
T-cell level achieved in response to antiretroviral therapy provides an
equivalent assessment of the degree of immune system function or has the same predictive
value for risk of opportunistic infections as do CD4+ T-cell levels
obtained in the absence of therapy is unknown.
Mumps
and rubella vaccine viruses have not been recognized to cause serious
complications in HIV-infected persons, but these and other live vaccines should
be withheld from severely immunocompromised persons
as they are unlikely to benefit and complications could occur.
ASSESSMENT
OF IMMUNOLOGIC STATUS OF HIV-INFECTED CHILDREN, ADOLESCENTS, AND YOUNG ADULTS
The
HIV infection status of all infants born to HIV-infected women should be
monitored.19 An HIV culture or a polymerase chain reaction are the
preferred methods for diagnosing HIV infection among infants.19,20
The CD4 counts and percentages should be measured to assess the HIV-infected
child's immune status, risk for disease progression, and need for
antiretroviral therapy.20-22 Quality standards for the enumeration
of CD4 lymphocytes in children, adolescents, and young adults infected with HIV
have been established.20,23 All HIV-infected children, adolescents,
and young adults should have an initial CD4 lymphocyte count determined and
repeated at least every 3 to 4 months if the initial count is >500/µL. If
the initial count is between 200 and 500/µL) and the patient is asymptomatic,
the assay should be repeated at intervals determined by the physician but no
less frequently than every 3 to 4 months.20,23
Severe
Immunosuppression
The
definition of severe immunosuppression is currently
based on CD4+ T-lymphocyte enumeration stratified by age.24,25 Once
a child has met the definition of severe immunosuppression,
the child is always considered severely immunosuppressed.
Passive
Immunization to Prevent Measles
Immunized
HIV-infected children, adolescents, and young adults have contracted wild type
measles and sustained severe disease. If exposed to measles, all HIV-infected
infants, children, and adolescents, as well as children of unknown infectious
status born to HIV-infected women, should receive 0.5 mL/kg
(maximum dose, 15 mL) of immune globulin
intramuscularly, regardless of their immunization status, because it is
impossible to know in a timely fashion if the child has protective antibody. If
the person exposed to measles is receiving intravenous immune globulin (IGIV)
(400 mg/kg) and >3 weeks have elapsed since the last dose, the person
should receive IG (0.5 mL/kg) or IGIV (400 mg/kg) as
soon as possible. Because of the uncertainty regarding measles antibody
concentrations in IGIV and the rapid metabolism of IGIV in HIV-infected
children, some experts have chosen to administer an additional dose of IGIV if
2 or more weeks have elapsed since IGIV has been administered at the time of
measles exposure.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Severely immunosuppressed HIV-infected infants, children, adolescents,
and young adults should not receive measles virus-containing vaccines.
2. HIV-infected children,
adolescents, and young adults without evidence of severe immunosuppression
should receive MMR vaccine. The first dose should be administered at 12 months
of age. The second dose may be given as soon as 28 days after the first dose.
In the event of an outbreak in the community, vaccination with monovalent measles vaccine (or MMR) is recommended for
infants as young as 6 months when exposure to natural measles is considered
likely. Children vaccinated before the first birthday should be revaccinated
with MMR at 12 months, and an additional dose may be given as soon as 28 days
later.
3. All members of the
household of an HIV-infected person should receive measles vaccine unless they
are HIV-infected and severely immunosuppressed, were
born before 1957, have had physician-diagnosed measles, have laboratory
evidence of measles immunity, have had age-appropriate immunizations, or have a
contraindication to measles vaccine.
4. If they are exposed to wild
type measles, immune globulin prophylaxis should be administered to all
HIV-infected children and adolescents and to children of unknown infection
status born to HIV-infected women, regardless of the degree of immunosuppression or measles immunization status.
REFERENCES
1. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. Measles in HIV-infected children,
2. Kaplan LJ, Daum RS, Smaron M, McCarthy CA.
Severe measles in immunocompromised patients. JAMA. 1992;267:1237-1241
3. Sension MG, Quinn T, Markowitz LE, et al. Measles in hospitalized children
infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Dis
Child. 1988;142:1271-1272
4. Friedman S. Measles in
5. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. Measles pneumonitis following
measles-mumps-rubella vaccination of a patient with HIV infection: 1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996;45:603-606
6.
7. Enders JF, McCarthy K, Mitus A, Cheatham WJ. Isolation of measles virus at autopsy
in cases of giant-cell pneumonia without rash. N Engl
J Med. 1959;261:875-881
8. Mitus A, Holloway A, Evans AE,
Enders JF. Attenuated measles vaccine in children with acute leukemia. Am J Dis Child. 1962;103:413-418
9. Nadel S, McGann
K, Hodinka RL, Rutstein R, Chatten J. Measles giant cell pneumonia in a child with
human immunodeficiency virus Infection. Pediatr
Infect Dis J. 1991;10:542-544
10. Markowitz LE, Chandler FW, Roldan EO, et al. Fatal measles pneumonia without rash in a
child with AIDS. J Infect Dis. 1988;158:480-483
11. Embree JE, Datta
P, Stackiw W, et al. Increased risk of early measles
in infants with human immunodeficiency virus type 1-seropositive mothers. J
Infect Dis. 1992;165:262-267
12. Krasinski K, Borkowsky
W. Measles and measles immunity in children infected with human immunodeficiency
virus. JAMA. 1989;261:2512-2516
13. Palumbo P, Hoyt L, Demasio K, Oleske J, Connor E.
Population-based study of measles and measles immunization in human
immunodeficiency virus-infected children. Pediatr
Infect Dis J. 1992;11:1008-1014
14. Brena AE, Cooper ER, Cabral HJ, Pelton SI. Antibody response to measles and rubella vaccine
by children with HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1993;6:1125-1129
15. Walter EB, Katz SL, Bellini WJ. Measles immunity in HIV-infected children. Pediatr AIDS HIV Infect. 1994;5:300-304
16. Al-Attar I, Reisman J, Muehlmann M, McIntosh
K. Decline of measles antibody titers after immunization in human
immunodeficiency virus-infected children. Pediatr
Infect Dis J. 1995;14:149-151
17. Arpadi SM, Markowitz
LE, Baughman AL, et al. Measles antibody in vaccinated human immunodeficiency
virus type 1-infected children. Pediatrics. 1996;97:653-657
18. Rudy BJ, Rutstein RM, Pinto-Martin J. Responses to measles
immunization in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Pediatr. 1994;125:72-74
19. El-Sadr
W, Oleske JM, Agins BE, et
al. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 7. Evaluation and Management of Early
HIV Infection. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services,
Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, January
1994; AHCPR publication 94-0572
20.
21. National Pediatric and
22. Wilfert CM, Gross PA, Kaplan JE,
et al. Quality standard for the enumeration of CD4+ lymphocytes in infants and
children exposed to or infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21(suppl
1):S134-S135
23. Gross PA, Phair JP, Kaplan JE, Holmes KK, Masur
H. Quality standard for the enumeration of CD4+ lymphocytes in adults and
adolescents infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin
Infect Dis. 1995;21(suppl 1):S126-S127
24. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. 1994 revised classification system for human immunodeficiency
virus infection in children less than 13 years of age. MMWR Morb
Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994;43(RR-12):1-19
25. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and
expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1992;41(RR-17):1-19
Pediatrics
Volume 103, Number
The
recommendations in this statement do not indicate an exclusive course of
treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into
account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.
© Copyright 1999 by the
No part of this statement may be reproduced in any form or by any means
without prior written
permission from the